RANDOM SPECIFICS
  • Blog

NAVIGATING THE WHALE: PART V

2/10/2013

Comments

 

Being a record of my journey as I undertake a new role that, unlike many others I have played, fills me with a sense of immense challenge and a promise of growth, both as an actor and a seeker.

I sit in a chair in the costume shop, and I suddenly find it a little hard to breath. I am almost overwhelmed with sadness, a feeling of isolation, and a distant sense of a deeply buried rage. I’ve come down to South Coast Rep for a fitting with Amy Hutto and Laurie Donati, who are designing and building what I am calling “my body.” I am calling it my body because, as I mentioned in an earlier post, I don’t want to call it by the more common industry name. I will inhabit it this body to become Charlie in The Whale. To call it by its common name would be to separate myself from myself. I want to be as integrated with this new body as I can possibly be for the next two months.

Laurie and Amy have done the preliminary work on the innermost layer of my body, which is made from Powernet, a spandex fabric which resembles a very thick, strong stocking material. It needs to have a snug fit so that it can anchor the rest of my body. Amy and Laurie are making sure it fits properly before they begin the extensive work of attaching the huge amount of necessary foam and padding. First I don a cotton onesie that covers me from just below the knees to just past my elbows. This can be washed between each performance, which will make life more pleasant, especially for anyone having to spend time near me. This body can only be washed once a week, since it will take two days to dry. On top of the onesie goes a specially designed vest worn by performers playing characters at theme parks in hot weather. It has four large pockets running top to bottom, two on the front and two on the back. The pockets hold large packs of a special gel. The packs are kept in the freezer between shows, and will go into the vest to keep me from overheating during performances. On top of the onesie and the vest goes the innermost layer of my body. Once I have it on, Laurie measures and pins. When that’s done, she and Amy ask if I want to try on a prosthetic suit that they made for another actor in a different play. It’s about a quarter of the size that my body will become, but they say it should give me a preliminary idea of what it will feel like. They help me into it, and I stand for a few moments, getting a sense of this new bulk and shape. Then the feelings begin to flood in. I sit, and hold back the tears.


There’s has been a flurry of other activity this past two weeks as we gear up to start rehearsal. There’s an audition session where I read with the actors called back for the roles of my daughter, my best friend, and my ex-wife. I am not part of the casting decision process, but the next day I speak with Joanne DeNaut, SCR casting director, to find out the results. The actors cast in each of the three roles were the ones that I would have chosen, so I’m feeling very confident about the team being assembled. In addition I have to keep up with my reading list, which is growing instead of getting smaller. Song of Myself has been added. I’m still working my way through Moby Dickalong with the rest of the material, and on some wild tangent I found myself reading The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner. Don’t ask me why. I also I found time to read the play again, start to finish, in one sitting, since that is how it is supposed to be experienced, all of a piece.
PictureKevin Haney and his team.
Another fascinating and crucial aspect of my transformation is being handled by Kevin Haney, the man responsible for turning Martin Short into Jiminy Glick, as well as many other projects. I met him at his lab last week, and his team spent two hours taking a life-cast of my head, neck, and shoulders for use in building my neck and facial prosthetics. We’re not going to reveal anything of the full transformation prior to the opening of the production, but without giving anything away I can include some photos here of that first day in the lab, and the resulting life-cast.

PictureCompletely covered.
At the lab, they clothe me in a large garbage bag, shave my chest, shoulders and back, (yeah, middle-age is so attractive), put a bald cap on me, and slather all exposed skin with cholesterol, which will stop the casting material from sticking to me. Then they begin to trowel liquid goo over me from the top down, covering everything but my nostrils. Before beginning the process there was much concern that I might be claustrophobic, and they tell me that they’ll be checking in with me, that I have to give them a thumbs up or thumbs down. Apparently some people freak out when they’re encased in the quickly hardening goop. I assure them that I’m actually the opposite of claustrophobic. In fact, at one point in the operation, I cause some consternation to the team because I stop responding to their queries. The problem: I have fallen asleep.

PictureNap time.
When the team is done with the layers of goop, they cover it in quick-setting plaster bandages, the kind used to make a cast for a broken limb. It will act as a casement to hold the flimsy-floppy rubber mold when they use it to make the bust, or positive, that they will use to build the prosthetics. That’s when things get interesting. I thought plaster dries. But it doesn’t. It hardens as a result of a chemical reaction. And as everyone knows, chemical reactions generate heat. No one has told me this, and towards the end of the session it starts to heat up, very quickly, inside my cozy little head case. I start to wonder just how much and how quickly the heat will increase. But I trust Kevin and his cohorts, and before my brain is baked, they pull off the plaster cast, and cut off the rest of the mold. The whole thing takes two hours, with only about forty-five minutes in the dark.

PictureMe and my head.
The next day I return to the lab, and get to pose with my bust. It’s strange feeling, to look at this replica of me. At first I’m a little disoriented, thinking there’s something off with the image. Then I realize that I’m most used to seeing my reflection in the mirror. Now it’s reversed. Or not, depending on how you look at it. I’m back at the lab again a few days later to watch as Kevin sculpts layers and folds onto my life-cast, transforming it into an image of what my neck and face would look like with an additional 475 pounds on my frame. It is shocking to see, but also fascinating, and I return to the lab often over the next several days to watch as the process continues, and as his assistants work on other elements of the piece, experimenting with different materials under Kevin’s direction. Making a piece this realistic for a stage production is a challenge. We won’t be able to call “cut,” and have a team there for touchups, and so Kevin is experimenting with some new materials, to give the prosthetics the durability they will need for the run, while still having the enough flexibility for necessary movement and facial expression.

PictureThe finished bust.
And now, after awaiting the day with much anticipation, rehearsals will start tomorrow. Never before have I had a role that required this degree of preparation even before rehearsals start. It has been in large part solitary work, and I am looking forward to the camaraderie of the rehearsal hall. My next report will be from the front, after we’ve started rehearsal, or as Uta Hagen liked to call it, die probe, from the German word for rehearsal, with its roots in probe, or attempt. That’s where we will push, poke and prod the text, playing with each other in order to discover the hidden meanings and undercurrents of the events and relationships. Like medical students dissecting a body in anatomy class, we will pull the play apart, so that we can learn its intricacies. But unlike medical students, when we are done with our work, we will put everything back together, breath new life into the text, and The Whale will come alive.

Comments

NAVIGATING THE WHALE: PART IV

1/23/2013

Comments

 

Being a record of my journey as I undertake a new role that, unlike many others I have played, fills me with a sense of immense challenge and a promise of growth, both as an actor and a seeker.

My friend Ramsey Moore sits across the table from me with tears streaming down his face. I have just given him a detailed plot summary of The Whale, and clearly it has hit home.

“That’s the trajectory,” he says. “That’s how it happens.” He’s talking about the long-term, self-induced, life-threatening weight gain of my character, the 600 pound Charlie, and he is speaking from experience. When I met Ramsey 7 months ago, he was tipping the the scale at 475 pounds, down from 575. Now at 390, he is well on his way to a more complete recovery from the obesity that threatened his life.

As soon as I took on the role of Charlie, I wanted to contact Ramsey to ask if he would spend time with me. Would he speak frankly about the physical and emotional challenges posed by the weight, and what the journey was like getting there? I also wanted time to just observe what it was like for him to move through the world, which feels so different to him, and poses such different challenges for him than for the rest of us. It took me a couple of weeks to work up the courage to make the call. I was worried that the request would be offensive, too personal. But Ramsey is an accomplished actor and stand up. In our social time together in the past I have come to see that he is dedicated to the craft of acting, and so I thought he would take my request in the spirit with which it was intended: I wanted insight, so that I could portray Charlie with honesty and understanding, honoring the challenges he faces. Ramsey, it turns out, was thrilled to be asked, and we quickly set up an appointment to meet.

At lunch, after telling him more about the plot of the play, I got out my black and white marbled composition book. It has “The Whale” written on the cover, and it has been my constant companion for the past few weeks, and will remain so throughout these weeks of preparation, as well as rehearsal and performance. I have a few questions to start us off, beginning with one that arose in the explorations of the movement of obese people with my children, when we watched videos together: Why is the gait somewhat stiff-legged? I hazarded a guess, and Ramsey confirmed it, but then he went on to an incredible description of the emotional realities that accompany the physical. Then the floodgates were opened, and Ramsey spoke on and on, and I was given a sharply focused lens into this world that I had never bothered to take a look at.

I am not going to talk right now about the details of the many things that I learned in my discussion with Ramsey. I will save that for a wrap-up article after our production closes. This is in order to preserve the power of what he shared for use in the show. One of the things that I have learned, and it has been a long, slow lesson for me, is that as you build the internal life of your character, (which simply starts to feel like your own if you are working correctly), it is crucial to keep that internal life private. More experienced actors that I respect told me this many times in the earlier days of developing my craft, but it took me a long time to believe it, and a longer time to start practicing it. The problem is that speaking of the private, unspoken fears and desires of your character diffuses the power of the internal cues, triggers and currents that you discover. It limits their impact upon you as you work. So it is best not to speak of the gems that you uncover in your digging until you don’t need them anymore. This is hard to do in the midst of what is sometimes lonely work, harder to do amidst the camaraderie of rehearsal, when you so often want to shout “Eureka.” Actors in general love to talk about themselves, and their process, as they are working. Train yourself to avoid this.

My time with Ramsey is a welcome relief from the slow, solitary work that I have been doing the past week, continuing to read Moby Dick, Under The Banner of Heaven, and other articles that I have been finding. I was also pointed in an interesting direction by my younger brother, Jed. I was describing to him a moment in the play when I reveal my true appearance to someone with whom I have only had a relationship on-line. He told me about the series Catfish, which runs on MTV, and mentioned an episode where a couple fall in love on-line, concealing their identities from each other, and the subsequent revelations as the deceptions are pierced. I watched it in my office, otherwise known as Starbucks, and I had my own turn to cry in public. You can watch it here: Catfish, Episode 6. Again, inspiration from an unlikely place.

After our long lunch and discussion, Ramsey and I are feeling pretty somber. Tracing the downward emotional and physical spiral that Ramsey went through, and how it is reflected in the story of Charlie, has taken an emotional toll on both of us. We decide to lift our spirits with some mindless entertainment. We catch a showing of an action movie, ‘cause nothing lightens the mood like a comic book of a film with two-dimensional characters, some car chases and explosions. But I’m grateful that I have a friend in Ramsey, and that he is so willing to share his story, his experience, and his heart. He will be a crucial part of bringing Charlie to life.

You can get more information about Ramsey, as well as watch video of his work and stand-up on his website, at ramseymoore.com. For more information about this production of The Whale, visit the the South Coast Rep website, and please be sure to sign up for the my newsletter.
Comments

NAVIGATING THE WHALE: PART III

1/5/2013

Comments

 

Being a record of my journey as I undertake a new role that, unlike many others I have played, fills me with a sense of immense challenge and a promise of growth, both as an actor and a seeker.

So there I was, spending the holidays at my father’s house, joined by my children, and also feeling the pressure of the amount of work that I have to do to prepare for this role. I get precious little time with Sam and Abby, and I was loath to cut into that time, so I tried to find a way that I could do my work and include my children in the process in a way that would be interesting and fun for them. What I hit upon was the idea of all three of us watching online videos of people who suffer from obesity, and then discussing and exploring the ways that they move. Sam and Abby were great. They gave focused attention as they watched these men and women struggle to walk, to go up and down stairs, to sit and stand from seated positions. We all spent some time exploring that movement ourselves, and they pointed out many details, offering helpful suggestions and criticism. We found a way to turn it into play for all of us, and I got valuable work done with their help. (I want to point out that play is such a crucial part of what we do. There is a real need to reconnect with our creative child as we create a character, and kids can be a window into, and an inspiration towards, unselfconscious play — witness this dance that my daughter choreographed for the two of us over our holiday, where you can also see how my beard has started to come in.)

Some have suggested that I not worry too much about the movement of the character, pointing out that I will be wearing a very heavy prosthetic suit.  My thinking, however, is that it would be a mistake to let the suit do all the work. Certainly it will help. But without exploring the issues these people face, I will simply be moving the way a healthy 175 pound man moves while wearing a prosthetic that weighs somewhere around 50 or 60 pounds. I need to incorporate many other elements. I don’t know all the questions that need to be asked around this issue, but I do know that I need to ask what do my hips, knees, ankles feel like? Why is the gait somewhat stiff legged? I am assuming right now that it is because the musculature can’t support the weight if the knee is bent. These are the issues I need to start exploring, and I know that these details are crucial to a portrait that will have depth and honesty.

On a more humorous note, I received an email from a composer friend, the estimable Michael Roth, who will be working on The Whale. Michael and I have worked together a couple of times, most notably on Dinner With Friends, and now he had this to say: “… my first challenge for the show, far less formidable than yours, but a challenge nonetheless, was to find gay porn sounds for your laptop. Well, a boy has to do what a boy has to do, so to speak. So I have the sounds, ain’t they something, and if it would be useful to you to have an endless loop of it to just play and play over and over again all the time (while reading MOBY DICK for example, as I recall it’s a long book), just let me know — consider it a slightly belated Hanukah gift/early xmas gift. Just wanted to let you know I was thinking of you in my own unique way.”

Ah, the things you never thought you’d be listening to. I got together with Michael a few days after hearing from him, and we went to a movie (the new Bond film — get your mind out of the gutter). Afterwards we went back to his studio, where he played me the two tracks he had selected, as well as a third he had created by mixing the first two together. After all the kidding around, I did ask him to burn me a CD of the three tracks. I need to spend some time listening to them, and I’ll explain why.

I happen to be straight. I have had the opportunity a couple of times to play someone of a different sexual orientation than my own, and it has not been difficult to make the adjustment. Playing Charles Busch’s boyfriend in hisYou Should Be So Lucky, or the confirmed bachelor Uncle Paul in A. R. Gurney’s Indian Blood did not require huge leaps. But I do have to admit that playing a scene in which I am listening to, and aroused by, a sexual soundtrack that will have only male voices, grunts, groans and slaps — that will require some extra focus and substitution for me. We are attracted to and aroused by the things we are attracted to and aroused by, and I do not pass judgment on whatever that might be, for myself or anyone else. But to find ways of being aroused by the things that don’t normally engender that response, that is where the work comes in. Having the audio tracks ahead of time, listening to them and allowing myself to acclimate to them will help me make that substitution. This is a curios profession. You get to do many things you never thought you’d get to do.
Comments

December 29th, 2012

12/29/2012

Comments

 
"Desire for an idea is like bait. When you’re fishing, you have to have patience. You bait your hook, and then you wait. The desire is the bait that pulls those fish in—those ideas.
The beautiful thing is that when you catch one fish that you love, even if it’s a little fish—a fragment of an idea—that fish will draw in other fish, and they’ll hook onto it. Then you’re on your way. Soon there are more and more and more fragments, and the whole thing emerges. But it starts with desire."


 David Lynch, from his book, Catching the Big Fish. True in art, and in life, as well.
Comments

NAVIGATING THE WHALE: PART II

12/27/2012

Comments

 

Being a record of my journey as I undertake a new role that, unlike many others I have played, fills me with a sense of immense challenge and a promise of growth, both as an actor and a seeker.

“And stop shaving. It will soften the lines around your jaw, give more of an impression of weight.”

Just what I wanted to hear. It’s December 20th, a couple of days after I take on the role of Charlie in The Whale. I have stopped by the office of Martin Bensen, one of the founding artistic directors of SCR. Martin will be helming our ship as we navigate this play.

I am not averse to growing a beard for a role. I had to grow one several years ago, to portray Matt Friedman in Talley’s Folly, and as I look at this photofrom the production I actually think I looked pretty good with it. But I also realize that Charlie, the character I am preparing to play now, doesn’t really care about his appearance, so that means no trimming or edging. I’ll just have to let it grow ragged, particularly down my neck, which it seems will be the most difficult part to deal with when trying to make me look extremely overweight. So I just have to start letting myself look like crap and keep it going for the next few months. Great.

Aside from the facial hair, Martin and I discuss the prosthetics that will be used to put another 425 pounds on my frame. This prosthetic suit has a common name in industry parlance, but I will refrain from using it here. It strikes me as disrespectful not only to those who suffer from this condition, but to the character I am to be playing as well, and I think it is of paramount importance to always come to our characters with respect, kindness, and even love, if we can muster it.

Some have advised me to ask that the prosthetic suit be made as light as possible, but I am of a different mindset. As I tell my students, I don’t want to have to do a lot of acting when I am on stage. If we do our work correctly, then at the time of actual performance, we don’t have to do any work at all. The better our preparation, the more we are able to walk out on stage and simply “be.” To that end, the suit will help me with the physicality of the role, not merely in terms of how I look in it, but in how it restricts and affects my movement. The good news from Martin is that ice packs will be incorporated into the suit. That should help, as I’m told it can get pretty toasty in there. Finally, Martin lets me know that we’ll be dying my hair, and probably my beard as well, as it is coming in almost completely white now, despite my tender years.

Aside from the physical realities that have to be planned for well ahead of time, there is a mountain of source material with which I have to start acquainting myself. To that end, Martin and I stroll over to the office of my old friend Kelly Miller, the Literary Manager at SCR, who will be dramaturg for this production. Kelly has compiled a list of source materials for me, including interviews and articles on the playwright and his own influences. She also suggests Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith, by Jon Krakauer, an examination of the origins and evolution of the Mormon Church. For my part, I have already started to read Moby Dick, which figures prominently in Charlie’s interior world, diverting myself along the way with The Book of Jonah and 1 Kings 16-22, which deals with the biblical Ahab. I’m also working my way through The Book of Job, as well as putting some time in with The Book of Mormon. All of this reading will put me in touch with the history, references, knowledge, and themes that work their way through Charlie’s mind, both consciously and subconsciously.

In addition to connecting myself to Charlie’s inner life, I have to figure out how to approach the physicality of the role. I can’t simply say that the prosthetic suit will do all of the work on that front. It will certainly affect how I move, but it will not, I am sure, do the job of making me move exactly like a man suffering from the challenges that Charlie is facing. It will make me move like a man wearing a heavy, binding prosthetic device. I have to start learning about obesity and congestive heart failure, as well as attendant side effects. How will I move? How does it feel to breath? To eat? I’m trolling the internet for information and video (Kelly already sent me some links to a show called “My 600 Pound Life,” on TBS), and reading up on information from the CDC and other sites.

These weeks of research are for me among the most exciting of a new role. They are one of the reasons I chose the profession. The luxury of having a job that requires the exploration of new topics, new fields, the ever changing landscape of our work as we go from role to role, that is one of the greatest rewards of this career. And right now I have the joy of being in the thick of it.

The Whale will be performed at South Coast Repertory from March 10th through March 31st, 2013. Information and tickets are can be found following this link.
Comments

NAVIGATING THE WHALE

12/20/2012

Comments

 

Being a record of my journey as I undertake a new role that, unlike many others I have played, fills me with a sense of immense challenge and a promise of growth, both as an actor and a seeker.

Like Ishmael himself, in Moby Dick, I have of late been going through a time of dark humour. It is fitting, therefore, that a daunting voyage has been laid before me. On December 3rd of this year, I received an email from my friend Joanne DeNaut, the casting director at South Coast Rep, containing the following message, somewhat cryptic: “Do you know the play The Whale, by Sam Hunter? I am going to send it to you and I think you should give it a serious read. I’m just saying … (and this is just between me and you). XO, Jo.”

I did not know the play, but I knew that it was on the Rep’s spring schedule, and so my heart immediately set to thumpin’. The prospect of a job is always exciting to me, even before I know much about it. I was already familiar with, and a fan of, both the playwright and his writing, having performed two readings of one of his earlier plays, for theatre companies in New York. Now it appeared I was going to be offered the lead in the West Coast premier of his new play, which was just finishing up a successful run at Playwrights Horizons.

I read the play in one sitting, something I recommend to my students. (See SCENE STUDY STEPS: A Primer for the Amateur and the Pro.) When I came to the end, my impressions were hazy. Certain plays lay themselves open to me almost completely upon first reading. This is not to say that they are simple or shallow. Certainly no one would say such a thing of Dinner With Friends, for example. But if the mind of the playwright is exceedingly simpatico with my own pertaining to the subject matter, the undercurrents of the play are often readily apparent to me. Not so with The Whale. Considering the plot and the main character that I would be playing, it seemed on first read that it should be depressing. Yet for some reason I felt a dense layer of hope lurking in its depths, under some distant thermocline. I was glad for that, as hope is a quality I much prize in work I undertake. I also knew that I could not begin to understand the play at all other than by going through the process of working on it. Even then, perhaps, my understanding would be only partial, as a four week rehearsal process coupled with a three week run does not allow for the deepest exploration of all aspects of such a rich and detailed work as this. And so, armed with the knowledge that the journey would be to some extent incomplete, despite my very best efforts, I immediately called Joanne and told her that I was in. I would be their whale.

Charlie, the character I will be playing, is an on-line teacher of expository writing.  The play deals with loss, failure, death, the search for redemption. Moby Dick, The Book of Jonah, Mormonism, homosexuality, estrangement from parents, lovers, and children are explored. On some of these themes and topics I have a multitude of experience, on others a dearth, and so I will be doing much reading and research.

Another of the challenges of the piece is that Charlie weighs in at 600 pounds and suffers from congestive heart failure. In future entries in this diary I will detail how the matters of weight and physical infirmity are to be handled, both by myself with exploration of the physicality and movement, and with photos of the work of the creative team giving support in the way of prosthetics.

For now, I am sitting in Starbucks, reading Moby Dick. I’ve never read it before. I have written a paper on it, at least one, in high school, and perhaps another in college. Listening carefully to lectures and skimming always served me well enough. Now as an actor, assaying a new role, my work ethic is different. Having finally settled on the path that I truly want to follow, I will be more assiduous in my efforts. I hope this diary will prove instructive, as well as inspiring, to my students, and to such others as have an interest in the actor’s craft. I will also note that the style of future entries will not attempt to imitate, however poorly, that of the great Melville, whose words I am now enjoying for the first time.

The Whale will be performed at South Coast Repertory from March 10th through March 31st, 2013. Information and tickets are can be found following this link.
Comments

SCENE STUDY STEPS

9/6/2012

Comments

 

A PRIMER FOR THE AMATEUR AND THE PRO.

​Part 2: The First Rehearsal, and Beyond.​     

You’re taking a scene study class, and getting together with your scene partner to rehearse for the first time. Where do you begin? I am assuming that you have already read the play, at least once. (No small assumption when dealing with people taking a scene study class for the first time; see Part 1 of this article.) You have already done some of your own preliminary homework, thinking about your character’s circumstances, the relationship between the characters in the scene, what your character wants from the other character. You have not memorized the scene, for reasons that will be touched on elsewhere. And now you are showing up at the home of another actor, someone who may be a relative stranger to you, who may have more or less experience than you. How do you proceed?

     First, some matters of etiquette. If you are the guest, arrive on time. If you are the host, offer something to drink, water, coffee, or tea. If you need to straighten up, be sure you do so before your partner shows up. You should plan on rehearsing for a specific period of time. I recommend an hour and a half, two hours at the most. Anything more than that in a single session gives, I believe, diminishing returns. You should start working as soon as you get together. Don’t socialize and waste time. You can do that afterwards, if you both want to. But make sure that when you have rehearsed for the allotted time, you are ready to leave, in case your partner has things to do.
     Next, just sit together and read the scene. Read it once or twice before you engage in any discussion about it. Read it very simply, with no acting allowed. By this I mean pay attention to meaning and syntax, but don’t put any spin on the words themselves, express no point of view, convey no subtext. Let’s take for example a simple circumstance: A man is asking his wife, “What time are you coming home for dinner?” If we have no preconceived notion of what is really going on in the scene (and we shouldn’t, yet), then you will simply ask the question. It is a simple question, and it  calls for a simple response: the time that the wife will be coming home for dinner. Ask the question as a request for that simple information. Later, as you explore the scene, you may have discovered, or decide to try out, different underlying questions that are really being asked with those words. For instance, “What time are you coming home for dinner?” can be read to mean “I know you already told me, but I wasn’t paying attention. What time did you say you were coming home again?” Read another way, it means “You’re always late.” Read yet another way, it means “Are you coming home for dinner? Are you ever coming home again?”
     After you have read the scene a couple of times, you can begin to discuss things with your partner. But it is important to note that there are some things the two of you should discuss, and other things that you might want to keep private. First, let’s look at what should be discussed and agreed upon between you.
     You need to determine and agree as to when the scene takes place: What is the year, the season, the month? It may be necessary to determine the actual date or the day of the week, if that is something that would have significance. Friday and Saturday night are different than Sunday. Characters in a scene that takes place on November 21st, 1963 live in a very different world than those in a scene in March of 1964, even if the events of November 22nd are never discussed. Other elements of time are important: The hour of the day, how long it has been since you have seen each other.
     What is the relationship between the characters? Is it familial, or are you just friends, co-workers? Are you strangers? If friends, how long have you known each? How did you meet, and where?
     Where does the scene take place, and how should you set up the space? If the location in the story is under the control of one of the characters in the scene, then that person should have more say about how to set it up. For example, if you’re doing a scene from The Rose Tattoo, by Tennessee Williams, the actor playing Serafina should have more weight in deciding how the set is laid out, after paying due deference to what is in the script. If, however, you are doing a scene from Talley’s Folly, by Lanford Wilson, you should discuss the set up and agree to it with your partner. That’s a location that is not under the control of either character. After you have discussed this, set up your space as best you can in the living room you are in, or wherever it is that you are rehearsing. Do your best to come up with a layout and set that you will be able to replicate using what is available in the class space. You want to be able to transfer your work into the class as easily as possible, and not be in a situation where you are saying, “Well, when we rehearsed it, the door was over there.” Keeping these things in mind when you set up will allow you to focus on the work, and not the logistics. The same should be kept in mind as you determine what, if any, activities you need to be doing in the scene. If the scene requires you to be ironing, as in Tennessee William’s The Magic Tower, work with an iron, ironing board, and shirt in your rehearsals, and then bring them to class. Whether the activities are dictated by the scene, or are activities you have chosen yourself, make sure you have all your props so that you can actually do them, rather than faking it.
     Next, you want to divide the scene into beats. Beats in a scene are not clearly defined, so this may take some discussion between you and your partner. With a little practice, you’ll get the hang of finding them. They are the small energy shifts in a scene. A husband and wife enter the kitchen and are making breakfast, exchanging small talk. Then the wife says, “I didn’t hear you come in last night. You must have been very late.” If the play is about the husband’s suspected infidelity, such an exchange will shift the energy of the scene, and there you have the end of your first beat. You will find that dividing the scene into these beats gives you a deeper understanding of what is going on underneath the surface for you.
     Next, you want to select a manageable portion of the scene to present in class. This will vary from class to class, depending on how many students there are, and how much time the teacher has to devote to each pair of partners. Initially, you might want to do only three to four pages. Don’t feel it is necessary to do the whole scene. Remember, you’re not there to entertain, but to learn. If the scene is really bearing fruit for you and your partner, you can always work on more of it later. To start, you want to simply spend your energy diving as deeply as you can into a small portion of the scene, really fleshing it out, exploring all facets of it. You will get much more benefit out of it that way then if you do a more shallow presentation of the whole scene.
     Now that you have your set, and you’ve selected how much of the scene you’re going to put up, start playing with it. Script in hand, dive in. Get up on your feet, or stay seated, if that’s how you are at the beginning of the scene, and start reading. Start putting action into the scene. Find the activities that you would be engaged in and do them, until something compels you to stop. If you’re supposed to be making salad dressing or putting on a tie, getting undressed or ironing, do so.  But never say to yourself, “Boy, I’ve been sitting here a long time. I should get up and do something interesting.” Move, but don’t move until you are moved to. Have an activity to do, but only if it is something that furthers the exploration of the character, and his or her needs and desires.
     Test different approaches to the scene. Don’t worry about the right way to do it. Probe it. Try it one time as if you both hate each other, and then another as if you love each other, then as if one of you hates and the other … you get the idea. Try going through it once where neither of you can say a line without finding a way to physically touch the other character, in as justified a way as possible. It might be that none of these approaches is the right one, but each of them will teach you something. For instance, in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, George and Martha may be at each other’s throats, it may seem to all the world that they hate each other. But how much more interesting, truthful, real it will be if there are other colors and layers underneath, if there is love underneath, fueling the rage over unfulfilled needs.
     Note: A good guide to use as you continue the rehearsal process is Uta Hagen’s list of six steps, set forth on page 134 of her text, A Challenge for the Actor. Examine these questions as you approach the text, and return to them between your rehearsals to confirm, challenge and deepen your discoveries.
     Now, as to memorization: This is often the first thing about which theatergoers ask an actor: “How do you learn all of those lines?” and it’s something that many beginning students worry about excessively. Don’t. First, the necessary repetition during rehearsal will take care of much of the learning. But more than that, as you rehearse, test, probe, and explore the scene, you will begin to connect with the needs and wants of your character. Your inner thoughts will start to take shape. You will begin to build what is underneath the dialogue, and then the next line will be that much easier for you to learn and remember, because your desires will be leading you there. Moreover, since you have not slavishly learned your lines by rote, you will not be tied to meanings that you have assigned to them arbitrarily, and you will be more free in your explorations. Then, as you arrive at the meanings that work for you, in the moment, the lines will be learned.
     A question I frequently encounter is, “What shape should the scene be in before we put it up in class?” There are differing views on this, and some teachers are happy to work with students when very little work has been done on the scene, guiding them along as if they were engaged in some sort of rehearsal process. I will do this, as well, if by chance there is not much work going up in class that particular week, or if there are students who need a demonstration of techniques for approaching the work. But this is not how I prefer to work, and I think it is a waste of the resources of a good class. The metaphor I use when discussing the issue with students is this: Suppose we were in a carpentry class, and the assignment was to build a table. You go home, get to work with your tools, and at the next class you present me with a beautiful table top, and four finely turned legs. I’m going to look at that and say, “Great. You have a tabletop and four legs. Now, go home, and attach the legs to the table.” The student will then say, “Well, I know that, but what else?” My response: “What else? Nothing else. I don’t know if you know how the proper way to attach the legs to the table, or if after you do, the table will stand after I put a heavy book down on it. And that’s what I need to know.”
     Likewise with a scene. The teacher doesn’t know what is in your head, where you’re planning to arrive after all your work and exploration. Neither do you. Only after you have done that work on your own can we really dive more deeply into the scene. Only then can we see if the choices you have made will support the weight of the character’s needs and desires. So work as hard as you can on it. Get it in the best possible shape. Prepare if as if you were going to be appearing on Broadway, or on a live television broadcast. Only then can a skilled teacher take you further than your own imaginings, talents, and skills. That is what you want — to grow beyond the limits of your current vision. 
Comments

LINDSAY JONES: CREATION WITH SOUND

9/6/2012

Comments

 
PictureLindsay Jones
We sit in a theater as we sit in a church or a temple, waiting to be inspired, to be told a story, to catch a glimpse of truth. The lights dim, fade to black, and the theater is formless and empty. Darkness is on the surface of the audience. We open ourselves, and a spirit of hovers over the stage. We hear a sound, or music. It penetrates us, a world is created, and our journey begins. If you’re a member of a lucky audience, or a very fortunate actor, that sound or music has been created by Lindsay Jones.

I have had the privilege to work with Lindsay on two shows, and in both, his work, which I would first experience in tech, brought me to a new understanding of the energies of the plays. Says Lindsay, “I always describe music and sound design as the emotional context of the show. If a set is the setting and lights are the mood, then music and sound is the thing that provides the emotional environment that the play lives in. As a result, it’s really important that you’re on the same page with the production as to what kind of environment that is, and how it can best serve the actors in helping them to find the inspiration that they need to play with.”

I asked Lindsay what serves as inspiration for him: The text? The director? What are his jumping off points as he begins his work? “Ultimately,” he says, “it’s all about what I see in the run-through of the play in the rehearsal hall. We can talk endlessly about what we want to achieve but, for me, it’s about a direct reaction to what I see the actors doing in their work. I think it goes back to my own training as an actor.” He graduated with a BFA in acting from the North Carolina School Of The Arts and so, as a sound designer, he approaches his work very much from an actor’s perspective. “I want to respond as honestly and openly as I can in the moment to what is thrown at me by the performers. If what I do is a direct response to them, then it’s almost always going to work out okay. The dangerous thing for composers/sound designers is to create content in a studio somewhere that is about some idealized version of the play they’re doing. I always make sure that directors understand that I’m not doing a version of Hamlet, I’m doingtheir version of Hamlet, and so, as a result, I usually come in towards the very end of the rehearsal process and try to soak up as much as I can about what everyone is doing.”

In Lindsay’s world, sound design and effects work together with music to create an overall environment. When creating music for something, he’s thinking about it with the sound effects in mind so that he can weave an aural tapestry. Although he composes music for both theatre and film, he only does sound design for theatre because sound design in fixed media is “frequently about recreating as closely as possible what things sound like in real life. However, in theatre, sound design is much more about creating a suggestion of what the environment could be like. It leaves much more creative room to find ways to reach the audience through things that maybe aren’t 100% accurate, but those suggestions can evoke a feeling that could be way more effective than just verisimilitude.”

The two plays that I worked on with Lindsay presented very different challenges, for both of us. Richard Dresser’s Rounding Third had to convey fairly realistic off-stage action. The actors on stage had to respond to it, and the audience had to follow it. I got Lindsay to talk about that a bit: “In Rounding Third, the director, BJ Jones, was really interested in using sound to portray the events of the baseball games. That took a tremendous amount of coordination to make it believable, while also making sure that you, the actor, could play along with it at the same time. You really don’t think about how many sounds there are in a baseball game until you break it down into all its parts: the sound of the pitch, the hit, the cheers, the catch, the throw, the next catch, the umpire, the cheers, etc. It’s a lot! And your character had to be able to react in real time to all of these sounds in a way that felt and looked completely natural, while not being able to see any of the action that we, the audience, were hearing. So we spent a lot of time in tech working through those sequences slowly. My work and your work had to be completely organic and fit together.” I remember this collaboration so clearly, and I also remember that the reality we created together was such that we frequently heard from members of the audience that they felt the could actually see the game.

“In The Scene,” by Theresa Rebeck, Lindsay goes on, “it was a completely different scenario. At the top of Act 2, your character was grappling with a midlife crisis and was having the greatest sex of his life with a much younger woman. The director, Jeremy Cohen, simply told me ‘I want the hottest, sexiest music that you can possibly think of.’ But the more I thought about it, the more I came to feel that the moment was really about the culmination of male fantasy. I really wanted to lean into that idea for comic effect. So I created a really slamming house music track, and then layered in sounds of pornography, disco and, of course, the most over-the-top male sexual thing that I could think of: The Tarzan yell. Then we just played it at ‘eleven,’ which I think gave you and the audience the freedom to lose all inhibitions in this crazy moment and just go for it.”

As an actor, I have to say that no matter how much we worked on that scene in rehearsal, it never came together until the sound was there to support it. It called for such a heightened and distilled reality, there was no way to convey it without the hyper-emotional support of the sound. Lindsay says, ‘There’s nothing more rewarding for me than when an actor takes inspiration from something that I’ve created, and what you and Christy McIntosh did with that moment was just pure magic. I loved watching it every single night.” Since it was just a play, not a movie, you can’t see me and Christy perform that moment, but you can listen to the track, Jungle Sex. But do yourself a favor. Don’t imagine me in flagrante while you listen. Imagine George Clooney or Jake Gyllenhaal instead, or someone else of your choice. I guarantee you, it will be much more fun.


You can find out more about Lindsay, and listen to more of his music, on his website.

Comments

SCENE STUDY STEPS

7/18/2012

Comments

 

A PRIMER FOR THE AMATEUR AND THE PRO.

Part 1: Before The First Rehearsal

     You are taking a scene study class. It might be your first ever, or it may be that you are returning to acting class for the first time since high school or a course you took in college. Perhaps you are pursuing an acting career in Los Angeles, and you have taken a plethora of courses: Scene study, cold reading workshops, on-camera audition technique, improv, etc., etc. Maybe you have never studied acting, you have studied with one teacher, or you’ve studied with more than you can remember. Maybe you’re a working actor, and you’ve been on a successful television series for 11 years. It’s just been cancelled, and you find yourself auditioning again. Now that you have the time, you want to pursue some theater work, but first, you want to get back into a class and polish some rusty skills you haven’t used in a while. Whatever your situation, no matter how little or how much experience you have, it is always helpful to either learn, or reexamine and reaffirm, the basics.
     My father touches upon this idea with an anecdote in his book, An Improvised Life, A Memoir, (I know, a shameless plug for the old man, but what can I say, I try to do what I can to help him out). He tells of a conversation he had with the golfer Arnold Palmer in which he asked him what he does to deal with the enormous pressure that is part of a professional tournament:
What do you do when you feel that?” I asked. “I go back to basics,” he said easily. Of course. It’s what he would have to have said. Keep your eye on the ball. Breathe. One of the greatest golfers in history, and he’s not ashamed to go back to the beginning. To start all over again each time he goes out to play.
In this spirit, I offer the following ideas. Some of what I outline here I would consider to be rules. Other items are merely guidelines, a flexible approach to use as you embark on what I hope is an exciting and fulfilling journey of exploration.

Get a Journal.

     If you don’t already have a journal or a notebook that you are using for your class, get one. I am partial to the ubiquitous marbled composition books that we all know so well. They’re inexpensive, and if you’re really pursuing this craft, you’re going to be going through a lot of them. Have it by your side all the time as you go through your work, whether it’s in class, when you’re alone examining the text and the character, or in your rehearsals with your partner.

Read The Play.

     The first thing you must do after your teacher assigns you a scene is read the play. The whole play. This I consider a hard and fast rule, with absolutely no exceptions. Now some of you reading this may be thinking, “Really, he had to tell us that? Of course we have to read the whole play. Who would think we didn’t?” Well, I’ll tell you. After several years of teaching, the answer is, “Many, many more students than you would like to think.”  If you already have a firm grasp on this and don’t need it explained, or you think it is too elementary, feel free to skip ahead to the next section. Why must you read the whole play? Here’s a story that might help to explain: I was once teaching at an acting school that shall remain nameless, and one evening I received a telephone call from the director of the school.
     “I have to ask you something,” he said.
     “Shoot,” I said.
     “Why are you only allowing students to do scenes from plays you have read?”
     I sighed and groaned, very loudly, but only on the inside. Clearly, he had gotten a complaint from one of the students regarding some very strong criticism I had leveled in class that day. The student had been working on what I call “The Hot Dog Scene,” from Angels in America. He was playing Joe Pitt, and at one point in the scene, when Louis was talking about how his friend is ill, the actor playing Joe put his hand on his arm, attempting to console him. I immediately stopped the scene. I knew in that moment that he hadn’t read the play. He didn’t know that Joe was gay, and hiding it. I asked him if he had read the play and he said no. I said, “You have to read it.” He said, “The whole thing?” And then I had some choice words for him.
     Back to my phone call with the director of the school: “Well,” I said to him, “as I have explained several times to the class, when I assign a scene from a play, they have to read the whole play, and …”
     He cut me off. “Why?”
     Another sigh and groan from me, and I think that the sigh might have been audible. “Because, even if I assign the first scene of the play, if the last line of the play involves your character saying something like, oh, I don’t know, let’s say it’s, ‘But Mom, I’m GAY!’ followed by a blackout, that is perhaps information that you need about your character even if you are only working on the first scene.“
     “Oh, I get it,” the director of the school replied after a moment’s thought. “But then how come they can only do scenes from plays that you have read?”
     Another sigh, another groan. This time, both were audible. “Because it is also information that I, the teacher, also need to have if I am going to effectively guide the student through the scene.”
     “Oh. Okay,” he said. He clearly didn’t like it, but he couldn’t argue with it, and so he had to go back to the disgruntled student and explain that, yes, learning how to act was indeed going to take some effort on his part.
     It is a good idea, if possible, to read the whole play in one sitting, since that is how they are meant to be experienced. At scene breaks, if there are any, close your eyes for a brief moment. Take a few breaths, then read on. If there is an intermission, go ahead and take it. Go to the bathroom, have a cookie or a glass of water, then get back to the play. Don’t have a drink with alcohol. Stay present with the story, attuned to which characters, themes, and events resonate with you, and which do not. You may have your journal near at hand as you read, but I would recommend against jotting things down as you go through this first read process. Rather, give yourself the gift of an uninterrupted read so that you can have the experience of the play.

Begin Your Analysis of the Text.

     When you are done reading the play the first time, now you can go through it again, jotting down notes and questions. Look up definitions of words you don’t know, check Wikipedia for information on references you don’t understand. Make sure you can follow the timeline of the piece, both internal and external, and where it takes place geographically. If the play does not take place in the present day, when does it take place? If the geographical setting is significant, do some research. A friend of mine, Gene Franklin Smith, wrote a play called Boise, USA, that takes place in, you guessed it, Boise, USA. It deals with a scandal and witch hunt circling around the investigation and allegations of child abuse and homosexuality in this Midwestern town in the ’50’s. Do some research. If you type “Boise” and “homosexuality” into Google, the autofill prompts you to “Boise homosexuality scandal,” and if you click on that, you get more than 500,000 hits that bring you to a wealth of information. This is a very simple example of how you can do research and where you can begin your inquiries. Use your imagination, and follow it wherever it might lead you for background on the time, place, and society that surround the events of your text.
     During this process, you now want to have your journal by your side, and use it to jot down facts, ideas, observations and further questions … always, further questions. Use your imagination. Ask yourself questions about your character, even if they seem at first irrelevant to the issues at hand in the play. If you can’t think of enough questions yourself, turn to Google again, and type in “acting character questions” and look at how many hits you get. Any of those results will be fertile ground and yield rich results.
     As you continue on your research on your role, (and it should be a continuous process, no matter how long you are working on the role), don’t be too rigid in your approach. Keep your spirit attuned to the happy accident. More than twenty years ago I was in rehearsal for the play Two Rooms, by Lee Blessing, playing Walker, a reporter pursuing a story from a woman whose husband is being held hostage in Beirut. I figured that Walker would be incredibly well versed in what was going on in the Middle East with kidnappings and terrorism, so I started to wade my way through two books,From Beirut to Jerusalem, by Thomas L. Friedman, and A Peace to End All Peace, by David Fromkin. Weighty tomes, both of them. Reading them was daunting work, and while I found that I was learning a lot about the forces leading to the tensions and crises in that part of the world, it didn’t seem to be helping me with the work of the play, which after all required human relationships between the actual characters. Then one day in a bookstore, an interesting title caught my eye, and I took the book down off the shelf. It was The Journalist and the Murderer, by Janet Malcolm, and it examined the complicated relationship between the journalist and his subject, as they spend time together while the journalist is gathering the information for work. Now that was what I needed, and it ended up informing my performance in that play in a profound way, and changing the way I work to this day. My approach now is to find and inform myself on as much of the world of the play as I can, focusing on such aspects as will influence mycharacter and my behavior. Such inquiry deepens not only my work as an actor, but also my view of, and relationship to, the people and the world around me. That is the greatest reward that this career has to offer: An eye-opening quest for a greater understanding of humanity.

In the next post, Part 2: The First Rehearsal.

You can listen to my father discussing his book An Improvised Life, A Memoir, in an interview on NPR’s Talk of the Nation here, or if you are interested in ordering a copy,  you can follow this link to Amazon.
Comments

BRUCE GLASSMAN: BREWING UP SOME BOOKS

7/15/2012

Comments

 
PictureBruce Glassman
My friend Bruce Glassman has a message for aspiring artists, actors, and writers: “Life is not linear. You never know when the different things that you learn and study are going to intersect with each other.”

     Like most of the people who I really respect in the arts, Bruce wears a number of hats, not counting the baseball cap we covered with tin foil one evening to keep the transmissions out — this after sampling several craft beers. A man of wide ranging interests, he always wanted to be a writer. He also wanted to support himself and his family, and he knew that those two goals are not an either/or proposition. After we graduated from Wesleyan University, he went on to a job at St. Martin’s Press to learn the publishing industry before joining and then taking over his parents’ small educational publishing house, Blackbirch Press. While at St. Martin’s, he attended The French Culinary Institute, but since he doesn’t do things half-way, he took the full professional training course.
​ 

     During the years running Blackbirch, Bruce was writing non-fiction books for such companies as Scholastic, as well as cogitating on his own creative writing and turning out his own plays and screenplays, one of which is now under option with a Hollywood production company. “Those experiences at FCI and Blackbirch seemed to run on parallel, non-intersecting tracks for a long time, until Blackbirch was bought by a huge multinational,” Bruce remembers. “That gave me the time and means to pursue my other interests and combine my publishing experience with my love of cooking.”

Picture
With his newfound freedom, Bruce worked to develop Chefs Press, which partners with celebrity chefs to build their own brands and create cookbooks, such as Jeff Rossman’s From Terra’s Table, New American Food, Fresh From Southern California’s Organic Farms. It has also been the platform from which he has published his own book, San Diego’s Top Brewers: Inside America’s Craft Beer Capital, which debuted last year at the kick-off of San Diego Beer Week. I was down there to help him with the launch party and the festivities that followed, and I’ll tell you, it was tough work, surrounded for a whole week by some of the best beer in the world, as well as new creations from the county’s best up-and-coming chefs. All of this feeds not just the belly, but the creative soul as well. “Not all of the writing that I do is the kind of writing that I have dreamed of doing,” says Bruce, “but writing of any kind is a creative process in and of itself, whether I am writing a book I have contracted to write, or a cookbook that I’m collaborating on with one of our chef clients, or I’m writing a play or a screenplay of my own.”
     Over a bottle of Ballast Point Sculpin IPA and a Fried Green Tomato Sammy from the MIHO Gastrotruck, Bruce notes, “One of the most satisfying aspects of my life is that I have been able to create opportunities for myself to do the things that I really enjoy. The beer book was something I really wanted to do, and loved doing in the process. The finished product? I’m really proud of it, and it’s helping me fulfill by professional goals.”

Picture
And those goals are keeping him very, very busy right now. On the heels of the tremendous success of San Diego’s Top Brewers,  Bruce is now putting the finishing touches on two major projects: Come Early, Stay Late, with Top Chef Finalist Brian Malarkey, and Brew Food: Great Beer Inspired Appetizers, Main Courses and Desserts. He has also just begun production on Colorado’s Top Brewers and he’s already asked me to join him in the foothills of the Rockies to help with the “clean up” after some of the photo shoots. Well, someone has to do it. As Bruce says, “I guess the metaphor is, if you really like drinking beer, then find a way to make drinking beer a productive part of your professional life.”

For more information on the people, places and things mentioned in this article, click on these links: Chefs Press, San Diego’s Top Brewers, From Terra’s Table, Celebrity Chef Brian Malarkey and his restaurants, and MIHO Gastrotruck.

Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    RANDOM SPECIFICS

    Thoughts on craft and the creative drive.

    Matthew Arkin Studio
    ​

    Class Information

    Like what you read? Subscribe to one or more of my newsletters.

    Categories

    All

    Archives

    May 2023
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    March 2015
    April 2014
    May 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    August 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

  • Blog